Skip to main content
January 14, 2026

The Battle between The White House and Federal Reserve, and what it means for your business.

The Battle between The White House and Federal Reserve, and what it means for your business.

On January 21st, the US Supreme Court will hear arguments in a case concerning whether the President has the authority to remove a member of the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors. The case stems from the Trump Administration’s attempt to remove Governor Lisa Cook, and its outcome could have important implications for the Fed’s independence. Separately, the Department of Justice has opened a criminal investigation into Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, related to his past testimony before Congress. Some commentators believe the investigation is politically motivated, while others argue it reflects legitimate legal concerns.

Together, these developments have triggered a wave of political and economic speculation, making it difficult to separate fact from opinion and to assess the potential consequences with any certainty.

Read on to learn more about the Fed, its role in the economy, and why this dispute matters for businesses.

What is the Federal Reserve

The Fed is the central bank of the United States and plays a foundational role in the economy. Its responsibilities include managing the nation’s money supply, setting short-term interest rates, supervising and regulating banks, and providing economic analysis to policymakers, businesses, and the public. The Federal Reserve System is made up of a Board of Governors in Washington, DC, and 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks spread across the country.

The Fed is often described as independent because its policy decisions do not require approval from the President or Congress, even though its leaders are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, and its authority is defined by law. This structure is intended to insulate monetary policy from short-term political pressures.

Day-to-day decisions at the Fed rarely have an immediate impact on most businesses. However, over time, changes in interest rates and monetary policy can significantly influence borrowing costs, investment decisions, and the broader economic environment. The Fed may not often create sudden shocks, but it plays a major role in shaping long-term economic conditions.

What is this fight about

At its core, the current dispute centers on the degree of independence the Federal Reserve should have from the executive branch. The Trump Administration has repeatedly criticized Fed leadership and has taken steps that, if upheld by the courts, could expand presidential authority over who serves on the Fed’s Board of Governors.

Supporters of greater presidential influence argue that monetary policy should be more directly accountable to elected officials, who can respond to public concerns about inflation, employment, and economic growth. Critics counter that this would politicize interest-rate decisions and encourage short-term thinking, undermining the Fed’s ability to manage the economy over the long run.

The Supreme Court case involving Governor Cook and the DOJ investigation into Chairman Powell are widely seen as tests of how strong the Fed’s independence is in practice. While neither action by itself would automatically place monetary policy under direct presidential control, together they raise questions about how protected the Fed’s leadership is from political pressure, and what that could mean for future economic decision-making.

 

What does this mean for your business

For most businesses, the immediate impact of this dispute will be limited. The Fed is still operating as normal, interest-rate decisions are still being made through established processes, and no court ruling or investigation has yet changed how monetary policy is set. In the short term, there is no reason to expect sudden shifts in borrowing costs or access to credit purely as a result of these legal and political developments.

That said, uncertainty itself can have consequences. Public challenges to the Fed’s independence tend to increase market volatility, particularly in interest-rate sensitive sectors such as real estate, construction, and technology. If investors begin to doubt that monetary policy will remain insulated from political pressure, they may demand higher risk premiums, which can feed into higher long-term borrowing costs for businesses.

Over the medium to long term, the stakes are higher. A precedent that allows greater presidential control over Fed leadership could make future interest-rate policy less predictable, especially around election cycles. For businesses, this makes planning more difficult. Capital investment, hiring decisions, and expansion plans all rely on reasonably stable expectations about inflation, financing costs, and economic growth.

The practical takeaway is not that businesses should brace for immediate disruption, but that they should pay closer attention to signals from financial markets as well as from the Fed itself. In periods where institutional norms are being tested, volatility and policy uncertainty tend to matter as much as the decisions that ultimately get made.

 

Key Takeaway

While the outcome of the court case and the DOJ investigation remains uncertain, the broader issue is clear. How much independence the Federal Reserve retains will shape not only future monetary policy, but also the stability and predictability that businesses rely on when making long-term decisions. For now, the situation is one to watch closely rather than react to, with an understanding that institutional change, if it comes at all, is likely to unfold gradually rather than overnight.

View all Blog Library
Loading

A popup encouraging people to exhibit at The Business Show Miami